Comments for The Phantom Observer

Comment on On Sex, Science, Museums, and Gordon Lightfoot by Patsplace

Patsplace — Sun, 20 May 2012 23:53:03 +0000

Pictures, paintings, recordings of whistles, paintings of bridges and examples of railroad gear is very much a part of Science and Technology. It moved the country. This homage to sex and what some might consider perversion is glorification of what. Sex ED as it “SHOULD BE”, not the way that parents teach their children. Sorry bud, there’s a time and place for such stuff, but it being in a museum frequented by children is not one of the places. Children and Sex are mutually exclusive and when they are not, then a short rope and a long drop is appropriate, but then I don’t really have an opinion on it.

Comment on On Sex, Science, Museums, and Gordon Lightfoot by Dave

Dave — Sun, 20 May 2012 14:05:13 +0000

Moore is such a west coast douche! On one hand claiming an exhibit at the Canada Science & Technology Museum is “insulting to taxpayers” yet is willing and able to shovel over a BILLION dollars a year to the shithole known as the CBC.
I guess “conservatives” are conservative in name only, the bastard child of the liberal party.

Comment on On Sex, Science, Museums, and Gordon Lightfoot by On Sex, Science, Museums, and Gordon Lightfoot | The Wellington Street Post

On Sex, Science, Museums, and Gordon Lightfoot | The Wellington Street Post — Sun, 20 May 2012 11:48:33 +0000

[...] “The purpose of the Canada Museum of Science and Technology is to foster scientific … Continue reading → … ← In today’s Sun: Mulcair is a [...]

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by William in Ajax

William in Ajax — Sat, 19 May 2012 03:24:53 +0000

You couldn’t pay me enough to be a bus driver, forced to take whatever abuse the public will throw at you and not be able to throw it back (retaliate) without losing your job.

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by Don from BC

Don from BC — Sat, 19 May 2012 01:39:22 +0000

I marked “Telemarketer” based my on 5 day experience when I was younger doing cold calls. Never again.

My second choice would’ve been “Fast Food”, but I will never work in the food industry in general.

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by Nicola Timmerman

Nicola Timmerman — Fri, 18 May 2012 20:11:10 +0000

Mayor of Montreal.

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by dmorris

dmorris — Fri, 18 May 2012 20:03:59 +0000

The only one of those jobs I couldn’t take, is mining, can’t stand enclosed places. But if it was Open Pit, no problem. I commercial fished nine seasons, loved it!

Many years ago, I felled trees for a couple of seasons. I liked it, found it challenging and exciting, dangerous, and worthwhile, like I was contributing something really important.

Liberal Arts Prof would probably see me fired for my un-PC views pretty quickly. Don’t particularly enjoy the company of the Lib arts crowd, either.

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by ebt

ebt — Fri, 18 May 2012 18:20:53 +0000

I don’t believe one applies for a job as a freelance writer. (A job as a staff writer might be really good or absolutely awful – that would depend very much on whose staff, and what you’d be writing about, and for whom.)

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by Alain

Alain — Fri, 18 May 2012 16:49:44 +0000

The only job I would never apply for would be one that I knew I could not do or that involved crime. That should have been an option in my opinion.

Comment on Blogging Tories Challenge: Which Job Posting Would You Never Apply For? by Fred

Fred — Fri, 18 May 2012 15:36:51 +0000

None of those jobs look that bad to me – Liberal Arts Professor is close, but perhaps I would get the opportunity to show them how it’s supposed to be done.

The question should not be “would EI be an alternative?” but should be “would No Money be a viable alternative?”.